![](https://electrek.co/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/05/nyc-bike-header-3-1.jpg?quality=82&strip=all&w=1600)
The New York Instances revealed a pair of articles this weekend highlighting the rising variety of deaths of cyclists driving electrical bikes. Nevertheless, in one of the crucial spectacular feats of victim-blaming I’ve seen from the publication in a while, the NYT lays the onus on e-bikes as a substitute of on the issues killing their riders: automobiles.
The primary article lays out quite a few latest tragic deaths of e-bike riders, together with that of a 15 12 months outdated boy in Encinitas, California.
The article even explicitly lists the largest hazard that performed a job in that crash, explaining that the boy’s bike “had a high pace of 20 miles per hour, however his route took him on a busy highway with a 55-mile-per-hour restrict.” And but the article appears to suggest that the e-bike’s presence was the compounding problem, as a substitute of studying into the creator’s very personal sentence to comprehend that the true drawback was that the highway didn’t have anyplace protected for cyclists to trip. There was no protected bike lane.
By all accounts, the e-bike rider was appropriately and legally utilizing the roadway in the one approach he may. In truth, in response to eye-witnesses of the automobile crash that killed the e-bike rider, he “did all the things proper,” together with signaling his flip.
The article goes on to element how simply three days later one other teenage e-bike rider was pulled out from beneath a BMW – fortunately nonetheless alive – and brought to the identical emergency room the place the earlier boy had been pronounced useless. Obvious reward is lauded on Encinitas for quickly afterwards declaring “a state of emergency for e-bikes”, which is a bit like saying we may simply resolve the college shootings disaster if children would cease strolling into all of these rattling bullets.
![](https://electrek.co/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2023/07/bike-crash.jpg?quality=82&strip=all&w=1024)
The article goes on to explain a number of different latest deaths from crashes of electrical bike riders, a lot of them youthful riders.
As Visiting Fellow on the Harvard Kennedy Faculty David Zipper identified, each single e-bike crash listed within the article was a collision between a automobile and e-bike. None have been merely e-bike crashes with out the added of a automobile. “All may’ve been averted if e-bike riders have been protected against automobiles (or if there have been no automobiles)”, Zipper defined on Twitter. “Battle the actual enemy.”
In a second NYT article this weekend devoted to e-bike security, eradicating any doubts in any other case with the title What Is an E-Bike, And How Protected Are They?, the publication does an much more olympic stage of psychological gymnastics to keep away from blaming automobiles for bike owner accidents and deaths.
Amazingly, the article makes use of a statistic stating how harmful automobiles are, however flips it round to suggest that as a result of research have confirmed that sooner transferring automobiles are harmful, which means e-bikes shouldn’t journey too quick, presumably to additionally scale back the hazard of those small and light-weight machines.
“By varied measures, the dangers of great harm and loss of life rise sharply at round 20 m.p.h., though a lot of that analysis concerned collisions between automobiles and pedestrians. As an example, the chance of extreme harm to a pedestrian is 25 p.c when the automobile is transferring at 16 m.p.h., and it rises to 50 p.c at 23 m.p.h., in response to the AAA Basis for Site visitors Security.”
It’s proper there. The reply is actually within the physique of the NYT article. Unprotected highway customers (pedestrians and cyclists) are more likely to be severely injured by automobiles because the automobile pace will increase. And but this statistic is used to suggest that e-bikes shouldn’t be used at speeds of over 20 mph.
There’s no deeper evaluation paid to the truth that the factor killing customers of fifty lb machines going 25 mph are the 4,000 lb machines that may go 100+ mph.
![new york bike lane](https://electrek.co/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/08/new-york-bike-lane-header.jpg?quality=82&strip=all&w=1024)
Safer biking infrastructure protects everybody
The reply is sort of easy: make streets safer for everybody. To take action, protected biking lanes should be put in. Nobody (outdoors of the few violent and aggressive drivers) really desires to hit a bike owner with their automobile. These accidents normally occur as a result of drivers merely aren’t on the lookout for the smaller profile of cyclists once they scan intersections for automobiles. We will implore drivers to be extra cautious, or we will merely transfer them away from cyclists within the first place. Solely a type of two strategies have been confirmed efficient at stopping accidents and deaths.
And that’s precisely the purpose. Automobile drivers can’t be trusted to search for cyclists, even when cyclists have the suitable of approach. And thus the reply is to offer safer, separated biking lanes with bodily obstacles.
These separated biking lanes subsequent to roads have quite a few advantages. They after all create safer areas for biking, however in addition they scale back site visitors for automobiles by encouraging extra folks get out of automobiles and commute by bikes. The safer folks really feel utilizing a motorbike, the extra of them do it. And research have proven {that a} 10% discount in automobile quantity can lead to a 40% discount in site visitors congestions. Moreover, separated biking areas even make cities safer for emergency employees on calls. Protected bike lanes within the Netherlands are even utilized by firefighters and ambulances (safely) to reach at emergency scenes extra shortly. Dutch riders shortly transfer over for emergency autos borrowing the lanes.
Many cities across the US are making progress on enhancing their protected biking infrastructure, however the wins are sometimes arduous fought in opposition to activist drivers who see protected biking lanes as some form of assault on automobiles. Nonetheless, every new protected biking lane is a step in the suitable route. The progress is sluggish, however it’s transferring ahead.
Now if solely somebody on the New York Instances may see that…
FTC: We use revenue incomes auto affiliate hyperlinks. Extra.