Join each day information updates from CleanTechnica on electronic mail. Or observe us on Google Information!
What number of methods to withstand electrification are there? What number of cognitive biases get in the way in which? I’ve discovered a number of them, however lately I found one other. Ports are within the enterprise of dealing with large honking plenty of gases, liquids and solids, and so are predisposed to assume that there are going to be a number of power carrying molecules of their ports for use by port automobiles.
How do I do know this? In current months I’ve had a few nice conversations with Sahar Rashidbeigi. She is the worldwide head of decarbonization for A.P. Moller Maersk’s APM Terminals division. APM has the concessions for about 70 of the roughly 800 ports globally that deal with over US$8 trillion of containers yearly. Maersk is a globally built-in logistics firm that has a core in container delivery, however divisions like APM that deal with container logistics off of the deep blue sea as properly.
![TCO comparison of hydrogen to battery electric container ground handling vehicles from report by APM Terminals](https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Screenshot-2023-12-03-at-9.44.10 AM.png)
Rashidbeigi and her crew lately dropped a report, Reaching a tipping level in Battery-Electrical Container Dealing with Tools, the place but once more a complete price of possession comparability had been pressured upon them, and which but once more discovered the bleedingly apparent, that the full price of possession (TCO) for hydrogen powered automobiles was quite a bit increased than for battery electrical automobiles.
Rashidbeigi engaged Auke Hoekstra, Program Director NEON analysis at Eindhoven College of Know-how, and his crew to construct the TCO mannequin. Hoekstra based the 35 PhD analysis group to mild the way in which to zero emission power and mobility. I’m positive that there’s one thing he and I disagree about after working the numbers, however I haven’t discovered it but. He and his crew do rock stable work.
When Rashidbeigi joined APM after stints with McKinsey, Schlumberger, an funding fund and with a civil engineering diploma from Iran and an MBA from Harvard, she thought she was taking an implementation job. From the surface, the area is clearly one the place direct and battery electrification is the clearly apparent answer, simply as it’s in each different type of floor transportation.
The cranes and overhead gantries have been already closely electrified, plugged into the grids and the gantries that have been nonetheless working on diesel could be tied to the grid too. The assorted floor automobiles — flatbed vehicles with containers dropped onto them, straddle carriers that rolled over containers to choose them up from above and attain stackers which are like the wrong way up fork lifts grabbing carriers from the highest as an alternative of sliding prongs beneath them from the underside — have been all within the candy spot for electrification. As a civil engineer, Rashibeigi checked out prime speeds of fifty kilometers per hour, quick distances, flat and absolutely paved surfaces and the requirement for high-torque and like everybody else leapt to the conclusion that battery electrical automobiles could be the one actual answer price contemplating.
And but, two years into her position, she’s launched a report the place the primary six pages are spent outlining the bleedingly apparent once more, with extra money and time wasted redoing TCO research which were performed to loss of life. She had her crew needed to write a hydrogen FAQ and a set of hydrogen questions for the executives and groups who ran APM ports globally, enabling them to fend off the droves of individuals pushing for hydrogen or spinoff fuels with easy questions on long-term scaled prices with out subsidies.
What brought on this? One of many causes Rashidbeigi and I do know one another is as a result of she reached out to me early this yr to ask what was driving this clearly odd habits round hydrogen for power and transportation. She’s STEM and enterprise instances literate from training and profession, so it’s apparent with out a lot problem in any respect to see that hydrogen simply isn’t efficient, environment friendly or cheaper than extra immediately electrifying, and she or he was baffled on the insistence of so many who it needed to be thought-about.
As I stated to her, there have been a number of overlapping teams that shared frequent motivations that deeply biased their pondering. The fossil gasoline trade is the geological hydrocarbon trade, and that hydro is hydrogen. They clearly know that hydrogen for power is an financial nightmare, with inexperienced hydrogen requiring way more renewable electrical energy than we have now on the planet at this time. Additional, they knew that blue hydrogen would get a number of governmental cash to seize the CO2 and put it again underground, furthering fossil gasoline subsidies. They knew that blue hydrogen would probably all the time be cheaper, even when a lot much less environmentally pleasant, than inexperienced hydrogen, and so the one supply of hydrogen for power could be blue hydrogen. In addition they know that with hydrocarbons, splitting off the carbon won’t solely price cash, however get rid of a number of the power within the fossil gasoline. Within the case of methane, 45% of the power comes from the carbon in it. Blue hydrogen is a lose lose proposition for power for everyone besides the fossil gasoline trade. for them it’s a win-win.
As Michael Liebreich says, they’ll’t lose by pushing hydrogen for power. Both they delay actual decarbonization by one other decade, and they’re succeeding properly in that. Or they get governments to provide them some huge cash to construct and function carbon sequestration applied sciences on prime of hydrogen manufacturing services. With out blue hydrogen being a serious supply of power, the worth of fossil gasoline agency’s reserves plummets. That cliff is coming.
Enter the bankers. The corporations closely into offering loans and fairness for the fossil gasoline trade are sometimes populated by STEM-illiterate finance sorts. Nothing unsuitable with that, however they depend upon the fossil gasoline corporations for STEM literacy and what is going to work. And so they actually don’t wish to consider that the fossil gasoline corporations’ funds are on quicksand as a result of if they’re, the banks go down with them, or a minimum of the particular bankers they work with. They’re extremely motivated to consider the story the fossil gasoline trade is pitching.
Equally, governments with excessive fossil gasoline royalties like Norway, Canada, Australia and the USA are simple pickings for the fossil gasoline trade’s story. They don’t need the direct and oblique GDP contributions to go away. They don’t need the entire fossil gasoline employees to be out of labor. They don’t need the individuals who feed, dress and entertain the fossil gasoline employees to run wanting clients. And politicians are ceaselessly many nice issues, however STEM literacy is nowhere within the requirement set. Leaders like Angela Merkel along with her PhD in quantum chemistry are radical outliers, not the norm.
Then there are the industries which depend upon utilizing fossil fuels, most notably those that construct and promote inside combustion engines of varied descriptions. If hydrogen or artificial fuels derived from hydrogen aren’t dominant winners within the decarbonization sweepstakes, their mental capital is nugatory. I’ve handled individuals from Daimler, MAN, Bosch and Wärtsilä now who’re all struggling to push the hydrogen rope uphill as a result of in any other case their careers, their firms and possibly their retirement are in danger.
However after talking along with her once more lately, I’ve so as to add one other group to my checklist of motivated thinkers: port organizations and the individuals in them. As she shared with me, the idea she handled many times was that there could be large tonnages of decarbonized energy-carrying liquids and gases — inexperienced or blue hydrogen, ammonia, methanol or one thing else — flowing by and saved in ports, so why not use a fraction of them to energy port tools?
I’ve handled a few main delivery considerations with giant bulk delivery divisions. They don’t seem to be anticipating huge volumes of replacements for coal, oil and pure gasoline to magically seem, though they’re undoubtedly hopeful. As an alternative, they’re making an attempt to determine what they will do within the coming years. One engaged me to help them with strategic choices for 2030. As I famous earlier this yr, just one new very giant crude provider is on order in 2023. The delivery trade has discovered that large volumes of bulk molecules are going away.
However port individuals apparently aren’t as conscious of this. Given the sheer quantity of hype associated to hydrogen and the reactive sheer quantity of hydrogen TCOs that make it clear it isn’t economically viable, it’s fairly simple to have affirmation bias overwhelm the cognitive dissonance of reviews like APM’s.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Need to promote? Need to counsel a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us right here.
CleanTechnica Vacation Want E book
Click on to obtain.
Our Newest EVObsession Video
I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we carried out a restricted paywall for some time, but it surely all the time felt unsuitable — and it was all the time robust to determine what we should always put behind there. In idea, your most unique and finest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer individuals learn it!! So, we have determined to fully nix paywalls right here at CleanTechnica. However…
Thanks!
Commercial
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.